Ratan Tata |
The Times, London, reported that Tata described Ambani’s home as an example of rich Indians’ lack of empathy for the poor.
"It makes me wonder why someone would do that," the London-based Times quoted Tata as saying in an interview.
"The person who lives in there should be concerned about what he sees around him and (ask) can he make a difference. If he is not, then it is sad because India needs people to allocate some of their enormous wealth to finding ways to mitigate the hardship that people have," Tata said as per the reports in The Times when asked about Ambani’s 27-storeys home, one of the most expensive houses in the world.
The 73-year old tycoon also expressed concern about the rich-poor gap and said, "We are doing so little about the disparity. We are allowing it to be there and wishing it away," the London paper reported.
Tata also hit out at the work culture of managers of British firms, Corus and JLR, and said “nobody is willing to go the extra mile” in critical situations, while their Indian counterparts would work till midnight in “a war-like situation”.
“It's a work-ethic issue. In my experience, in both Corus and Jaguar-Land Rover (JLR) nobody is willing to go the extra mile,” he said in the interview.
Tata’s comments come at a time when the Tata Group has announced cutting of 1,200 jobs at Scunthorpe plant, as well as shedding 300 jobs at Teeside and Hartlepool sites of Corus.
He added: “In India, if you are in a crisis, if it means working till midnight, you would do it. The worker in JLR seems to be willing to do that, the management is not.”
“The entire engineering group at JLR would be empty on Friday evening, and you have got delays in product introduction. That's the thing that doesn't happen in China or in Indonesia or in Thailand or in Singapore,” he said.
He lamented a lack of dynamism in industry, saying that Britain “needs a real push. It needs nationalism. The sort of spirit that comes during a war. It needs people really to want to see the UK sitting again, may be not as a colonial power, but as an economic power.”.
No comments:
Post a Comment